Publication detail

Lessons from more than a decade-long history of sanction in France?

Author(s): Laure de Batz M.A.,
Type: Article in collection
Year: 2017
Number: 0
ISSN / ISBN:
Published in: Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
Publishing place: LabEx ReFi Working Paper Series WP 2017-11
Keywords: financial markets, regulation, fraud, information and market efficiency, history, listed companies, asset management firms
JEL codes: G14, G18, K42, N24
Suggested Citation:
Abstract: In this paper, we examine the main characteristics and evolution along time of the sanctions pronounced by the French Financial Market Authority (AMF) since its creation. We consider an original exhaustive sample of 308 decisions, published on the AMF website over the period 2004-2016. Most of the sanctions resulted in a guilty verdict (90%), mostly associated with financial fines (94%) and/or with disciplinary sanctions (30%), after long procedures (2.7 years on average, followed potentially by appeals). Half of them were first published anonymized. The most frequently sanctioned market participants are listed companies, followed by asset managers or asset management companies. The sample under review was enlarged from 2012 onwards with a new kind of procedure, the settlements (32 from 2012 to 2016). The latter do not imply guilt recognition from part of the offender. Such procedures are by law quicker, target less severe regulatory breaches mostly done by asset management firms, and consequently result in less severe sanctions.

29

July

July 2022
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829

3031

Partners

Deloitte

Sponsors

CRIF
McKinsey
Patria Finance
Česká Spořitelna
EY